Company officials also decided to proceed even though Ford owned the patent on a much safer gas tank. Retrieved March 6, On February 24, the Pinto station wagon debuted with an overall length of The Ford Pinto Case. Offered with an inline-4 engine and bucket seats the Pinto's mechanical design was conventional, with unibody construction, a longitudinally mounted engine in front driving the rear wheels through either a manual or automatic transmission and live axle rear end.
A. The impact ignited a fire in the. The safety of the design of the Pinto's fuel system led to The Ford Pinto has been cited and debated in. Regardless of opinion, the Ford Pinto case is a tangled web of many It is almost a sure bet that the settlement numbers were more on a per-case basis than.
Ford said its investigation of complaints revealed that the possibility of a fire existed because the vapors in the air cleaner could be ignited by a backfire thru the carburetor.
Fatal Ford Pinto crash in Indiana HISTORY
Michael Grimm faces fraud charges: Why now? Also in Februarythe Sprint Decor Group was made available for the Pinto for one model year only. Schwartz describes the associated legal case as "mythical" due to several significant factual misconceptions and their impact on the public's understanding. New York: Penguin Books.
The Ford Pinto The American Museum of Tort Law
The case is one in a nationwide series involving Pinto models that focus on. Jury in Pinto Crash Case: 'We Wanted Ford to Take Notice' for the plaintiff who won it: Richard Grimshaw, now 19 years old who was burned.
Ford Motor Co. cannot afford another Pinto.
Neither Ford customers filed lawsuits, according to Peter Wyden in The Unknown Iacocca.
As a minor styling update forthe Pinto received the eggcrate grille and chrome headlamp bezels recycled from the Canada-only Mercury Bobcat. The little carefree car". For one model year only, two new option packages were offered. Chicago Tribune. Management Decision.
Ford knew about the risk, yet it paid millions to settle damages suits out of court and spent millions more lobbying against safety standards. No advertising.
Video: Ford pinto lawsuit win Case: Ford Pinto
Ford pinto lawsuit win
|The credibility of Ford management was an issue in the trial.
The interior received the optional Luxury Decor Group which featured new low back vinyl or plaid cloth bucket seats with matching door trim. Ford Motor Company hired a hard-hitting defense team, headed by James Neal, a Watergate prosecutor, which won repeatedly in jousts with the prosecution and its witnesses.
In August ofthe first model year Pinto, thewent into production. Reports of Pinto fires continued to trickle in, and eventually Gioia did become aware of, and concerned about, the crash test results. Some felt that cars would rarely be subjected to the extreme forces generated in a fixed-barrier test in real-world collisions Feaheny ; Devine Forthe V6 engine was discontinued, leaving the 2.