Crowds of people came to Onondaga County Court for closing arguments in the Robert Neulander murder trial. He's charged with second degree murder and tampering with evidence. Robert Neulander's murder trial. She's telling you who did this with her blood, her wounds. His first one centered around a juror who admitted texting during the trial. Shargel saved one of his sharpest criticisms for Menkin here, saying that there was no reason the defense lawyer couldn't have called Knapp or Pizzola to testify as defense witnesses. Shargel said it was improper for Fitzpatrick to assert Jenna's state of mind, adding there was no proof presented to back up that assertion. Deputy Lawrence Knapp: The Onondaga County sheriff's deputy also concluded that there wasn't enough evidence collected to determine how blood ended up where it did. Log in for unlimited access. Shargel said Menkin's failure to question Leestma more at trial was a "classic case" of botched cross-examination.
Jury Deliberating in Neulander Murder Trial
-- Closing arguments were just as emotional as the rest of Dr. Robert Neulander's murder trial.
For nearly two hours defense attorney Ed Menkin told jurors repeatedly his client is innocent and the. Shargel called Menkin's performance "woefully deficient" during trial.
Neulander tries for second time to have guilty verdict overturned WSTM
are the parts of closing arguments that Shargel found objectionable. Former Syracuse doctor Robert Neulander is attempting to have his of the evidence, prosecutorial misconduct by the DA during closing arguments, and ineffective assistance of counsel from his trial lawyer Ed Menkin.
If needed, the case will return to Judge Miller, who presided over the March trial. Syracuse, NY -- Robert Neulander's new lawyer is trying to set his client free by ripping the job his old lawyer did.
Robert Stoppacher, who changed his mind midstream. Here are the parts of closing arguments that Shargel found objectionable:.
What Are the Purposes and Limitations of a Closing Statement Nolo
He even cast doubt on the prosecution's theory of a bedroom attack, Shargel said, pointing to Knapp's observation that blood caused by an instrument i.
CABEZA DE GOLF 16 VALVULAS DE ALIVIO
|But Shargel said it was improper for Fitzpatrick to appeal to the jury's sympathy to encourage a guilty verdict.
He said you don't move a person with serious head or neck injuries.
Defense lawyer Edward Z. But Shargel argued that Leestma has, in the past, stated that it could take only an hour -- or even 20 to 30 minutes -- for brain cells to change color.
Video: Neulander trial closing arguments menkin The state presents closing arguments in Pistorius case: Session 1
Shargel's motion included a critique of two prosecution experts, and why he says Menkin fell short in discrediting them.
Accident or murder Investigating the death of Leslie Neulander CBS News
dozen instances of prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument; object to the admission of Neulander was represented by Edward Menkin, Esq. at trial.
Jan Leestma. For nearly two hours defense attorney Ed Menkin told jurors repeatedly his client is innocent and the prosecution's case is fictional. At trial, Fitzpatrick simply asked the jury to look at the photo and make its own conclusion.
Shargel also criticized the trial lawyer for not calling two witnesses the prosecution had declined to call.
Video: Neulander trial closing arguments menkin Neulander trial end day video
The prosecution painted a different picture. She's telling you who did this with her blood, her wounds.
Neulander trial closing arguments menkin
|Menkin botched the trial.
Again, he suspected Neulander of planting them there after the murder. Robert Neulander's murder trial.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Syracuse. But Shargel said that the discrepancies -- including when Neulander brought his wife a cup of coffee -- were overblown and that the DA suggested that Neulander changed his story to fit new evidence, when there was no proof of that.
But he didn't dismiss that theory outright, like Green did, Shargel wrote.