Seventh epistle in particular, audience determines the different methods of photographs that the poet employs as he refashions his relationship with his patron. Signifying the ambivalence of Horace’s social identifications, these completely different registers of images simultaneously make possible a revelation of patronage as a system of calculated curiosity, even exploitation, and a complicity with its ideology of social cohesion. The autobiographical view was popular early within the twentieth century when “biographical criticism” was still in vogue and “sincerity” was thought-about a serious crucial concern somewhat than a rhetorical effect. Thus Courbaud and Fraenkel noticed the letters as autobiographical and “real,” whereas critics of the previous few decades—Becker , G. Williams , McGann , Macleod , and Kilpatrick —have inclined toward seeing the Epistles as fictions that draw in various levels from experience.